Quantcast
Channel: Rick Potvin's Virtual Circumnavigation of Antarctica to Decide if Earth is Global or Flat
Viewing all 111 articles
Browse latest View live

Zhib Rohn used Google and other "online data" to try to prove distance between stations not consistent with ice rim.

$
0
0
Zhib Rohn disabled his comments and the embedding in his video where he tried to prove that distance between the Antarctic stations is not consistent with an ice rim. If he had not disabled the comments, I would point out to him that using Google data and other "online distance calculators" is a fallacy-- that the only way to get the true distance between stations is through slogging away as I am to find ANY distance and time information AT ALL-- as reported on blogs, inspection reports, anecdotes or other random sources. THOSE are few-- and practically non existent. I simply cannot find any Antarctica tourist, researcher or blogger who can tell me true experiences of travel between stations. The few that I DO have are fairly sparse in their data and their reports. Short of setting up a journey myself, I currently do not see how it can be done without a CONTROLLED MEDIATED output. EVEN the yacht races around Antarctica conducted for decades (they say) do NOT have the type of reporting and diary that allows for easy confirmation of distances. Just as those people who report the lack of non-stop flights in the southern hemisphere on Youtube, I'm encountering a LACK of true information. So Zhib Rohn's idea that he can simply verify a non-ice rim Antarctica from the highly controlled Google or the probably controlled online distance calculators who likely use GIGO (garbage in garbage out) data sets from NSA or USGS etc.-- is folly. Still, Zhib Rhon's video is INTERESTING from my point of view because he took EXACTLY my point-- to try to determine if Antarctica is an island or ice rim. He didn't think through the distance in numbers-- he says merely "thousands of miles" would be required between stations. I would say an order of magnitude of 4 to 5X the official distance would be needed to convert about 15,000 mile island to a 60,000 mile ice rim. I'm currently working on the geometry of Antarctica-- and what math transformation would be needed to convert a convex circle to a concave disc with a rim... and how the longitude lines are converted from converging to diverging. ALL organizations in the world would have to be on the "same page" on this transformation either knowingly or unknowingly as dupes with only need to know data. The LACK OF INTRA Antarctica station flight time and distance data and the LACK of such clear cut data from Vendee Globe yacht race-- is my best clue so far-- the LACK of a transparent and fully circumnavigational inspection tour documenting the time and distance using citizen checkable data and spot checking with blogger accounts, and other cross checks-- it's the LACK of this that seems interesting to me. Zhib Rohn TOO EASILY uses electronic derived sources and Google as a source and thus proves nothing to me.

There is no embed allowed but here's the link:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2-9oG6lB70">Zhib Rhanhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2-9oG6lB70





Caterpiller Corporation features many Youtube videos of their eqiuipment operating in Antarctica.

$
0
0
For a corporation, Caterpillar sure makes extensive use of Youtube to demonstrate the success of their heavy equipment. Of interest in this blog of course are the operations they have in Antarctica. Here's an example of an Antarctica video they posted. One wonders if Caterpillar Corporation "knows" Antarctica is an ice rim-- not a mere island "at the bottom of the globe". Nothing says "industrialization" and "commercial expansion" more than heavy construction equipment. This is the real cutting edge of the possible infinite outer rim of Antarctica-- with the phony baloney ecology angle being used as a cover for the big move "out" from the Earth Pond to possible infinite plains or new Earth ponds on an infnitely expanding flat universe. As Byrd pointed out in the 1950's, the resources "out there" rival what we imagined would be the resources in "asteroids" and "other planets". In the Flat Earth scenario however, those resources and worlds are "out there", in the "land beyond the Pole" as Byrd called it.



Here's a link to the Caterpiller Youtube site run under the Antarctica search term
Cat® Products - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/user/CaterpillarInc/search?query=antarctica

Sir Ranulph Fiennes selects Cat® Dozer for first winter crossing of Antarctica.
Finning Mechanic Servicing Cat® Equipment in Antarctica
Keeping Cat on Track in Antarctica
The Coldest Journey | Into the Depths of Antarctica

Cat® D6Ns Deal with the Punishing Elements of Antarctica
The Coldest Journey | Mary Mouse Camp Update in Antarctica
Cat® D6Ns Deal with the Punishing Elements of Antarctica
The Coldest Journey | Mary Mouse Camp Update in Antarctica

Team Digs out Cat® Equipment from Blizzard in Antarctica
Coldest Journey - Winter Traverse | Cat® Machines in Antarctica
Coldest Journey Team Antarctica - Challenging Weather Conditions
Keeping the Cat® D6N Dozer Moving in Antarctica

Keeping the Cat® D6N Dozer Moving in Antarctica
The Fuel Depot - Featuring Cat® D6N Dozers in Antarctica
Cat® D6Ns Maneuvering Sleds in Antarctica | Our Coldest Journey
Challenging Weather Conditions in Antarctica | Our Coldest Journey

A TOUCH OF ANTARCTICA - Our Coldest Journey
I'M NOT HAPPY - Our Coldest Journey Antarctica
The Coldest Journey | Walk the Longest Winch Line in Polar History
Wanted: Engineer to Work in -70 temperatures for six months





Comedic presentation of Antarctica says mining banned indefinitely.

$
0
0
I have a plan. I think I should lead a group to mine Antarctica. Nobody owns it. So why not? I didn't sign the Antarctic Treaty that bans it. I'm not bound by it. I thought mining was banned to 2040 but this John Candy Rodney Dangerfield fat man says it's permanent. He must be the spokeperson for the Antarctic Treaty (PBS). It's just entertaining from my point of view. Consider it comedic relief.

NSF / USNavy documentary: Power for Continent 7

$
0
0


Rick's Comment

1. What strikes me first-- after I quit watching 3/4 of the way through this "tripe" is that there is NO DISCUSSION of settlement and exploitation. It's all pansy stuff about "collecting rock samples" or "study of the flora and fauna". What assinine idiot would discover an entire CONTINENT and think that way? Why have not millions of people already moved to Antarctica?

If nuclear power is "real" then there should have been no problem melting ice for water and creating warm geodesic huge domes for habitation. But nope... since Nuclear Power is fake anyway-- we're stuck in the insane position of "studying" a continent, the 7th continent-- Is the number 7 an Illuminati significant number?-- instead of settling this new land like AMERICA was first settled with brothels, bars, cowboys, farmers and entrepreneurs.. not to mention piano players in the saloons.

 I had to quit watching because it makes me angry that they're shovelling this grovel at us instead of dealing with the issue of, say, how delicious penguin meat is... or whether to deep fry it or boil it. Entire "herds" of "friendly" penguin would be a protein source for human settlers. It's bizarre and not understandable to me how NO HUMAN SETTLERS have moved here to eat penguin. How is this possible in the past, and now the present?

DISCOVERY OF A NEW CONTINENT IN MODERN TIMES-->> is like having a new planet next door-- but no REAL ESTATE deals are being made. No cottages and private getaways are being arranged. No survivalist communities are going. The more I think about that, the more strange it seems to me. Maybe it's my second beer talking. I feel like re-reading my biography of Daniel Boone, the frontiersman who helped explore America and opened it up for settlement-- and promoting the idea of new Daniel Boone's for Antarctica.

I still cannot confirm distances but I found a private exploration company that will, if paid, arrange a trip for anyone anywhere. I'm thinking about making a proposal for a circumnavigation -- a complete circumnavigation-- paid for through one of those online fund raising sites. I'll document time and distance - and get this thing settled once and for all by doing it myself. The online data or other 3 and 4 letter agency sources simply are not trustworthy. Somehow, they "flipped" the rim into an island and then they isolated each research station so that nobody knows for sure what the extent of Antarctica really is. I simply cannot verify the distance AROUND this so-called island continent while sitting at my keyboard. I thought I'd be able to do it. I can't.


The Coldest Journey had to have been ill-fated from the get-go.

$
0
0


I can't tell from the map of the journey where it was STOPPED... is it the yellow flag? 

First Officer Felix who is frequently adding useful insights and comments to many posts here on this blog pointed to "the Coldest Journey" project in my earlier Caterpillar post. I'm not clear on what the intention of the mission was but clearly it was ill-fated since it's apparent that a group decided to "cross Antarctica" during the "winter" and "in the dark". My question: Why? Everyone in Antarctic research KNOWS that everything is easier in the Antarctic summer. What was the point of taking on extra risk unneccessarily?

My tentative answer is that the mission was NEVER MEANT TO SUCCEED... that it could be part of a campaign of brainwashing the world into a belief that Antarctica "can" be "crossed"... when in fact it's an ice rim around Earth Pond that is an infinite plain. The fact that the mission FAILED is consistent with the idea that there is no way to "cross Antarctica" but only to "go outward" and then "come back".
Here's the video First Officer Felix pointed to that documents the decision to "turn around and go back"-- the mission leader saying that the mission was too hazardous to continue.





The Coldest Journey has it's own YOUTUBE page and it's own homepage! One thing I noticed about the couple of dozen video thumbnails is that half of them are "BRIGHT" and obviously not during a 6 month long perpetual night of winter. How can that be? Many of the pictures are in fact in BROAD DAYLIGHT-- BRIGHT DAYLIGHT. If this mission was supposedly conducted during the winter "night" of Antarctica, we should see DIM light or NIGHT. Some pictures DO have complete darkness surrounding the subject matter. I don't understand.

Coldest Journey - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNVRJCNPpPaszObvUh_0x2Q/videos

Home - The Coldest Journey Homepage
http://www.thecoldestjourney.org/








Here's a short description of the mission from the homepage








THE COLDEST JOURNEY
POWERED BY IRIDIUM
Follow the progress of the Ice Team Live with our live map and regular reports on wind speed, temperature, altitude and more...Seeing is Believing

My comment-- This sounds like the type of thing I'd like to do with a CIRUMNAVIGATION... and I too would use the phrase "seeing is believing" as a motto-- since I would have the team prove the distance of the circumference one way or another. In the case of the Coldest Journey, I'm not sure what they were driving at with the motto. 


The official blog doesn't have much technical information. It's all about photos and fun. I'm beginning to suspect that the entire mission was fake-- like the Apollo moon landings and 9/11-- The entire mission could be done in a green screen room-- which is what I suspect is ALSO going on with the Vendee Globe yacht race. 

Here is a suspicious photo of a sun on the horizon that seems much too large. 
Here we see that the entire trip was sponsored. I wonder if the entire thing was a money making scam. Since they failed to complete the mission, did they return the money? Wouldn't it cost more than a "mere million" to do a mission like this with Caterpillar tractors, several men, fuel supplies etc? It seems to me that it's not possible to do a private sponsorship of a mission like this. There is no mention of approval by the Antarctic Treaty Authority either-- which would be the case if the entire mission was done in a green screen room. 




Rick says... Take a look at this guy, Spencer Smirl.

Rick says... I'm not sure what irks me about this photo. He was the chief mechanic hired to maintain the Caterpillar tractors. He's posing AS IF he accomplished a mission but he completely failed at it. If he was actually in the Antarctic at all, he endangered himself and his crew by agreeing to go to the South Pole from an UNTENABLE position-- the OPPOSITE side of Antarctica to McMurdo-- which is the GATEWAY to the South Pole-- during the WINTER. Who would agree to such a suicidal mission. The entire crew are lucky they didn't all die out there, if they went. How did the Antarctic Treaty Board approve this? Why would they? Why attempt this trip AND use it to raise money for BLIND PEOPLE? What the hell is the connection there? There IS NONE. They're making a fund-raising JOKE out of dangerous exploration of the 7th Continent, in my highly opinionated opinion.
Out of Antarctica: Spencer Smirl's role in the Coldest Journey - The Antarctica Issue v8.1 | techlife magazine
http://www.techlifemag.ca/spencer-smirl-coldest-journey.htm



Here's a cute video Dave Holden complete with a theme song "Colder than Ice". This entire mission needs to be "fact checked for fakery" in my opinion. One thing that struck me right away about this particular "Cat" tractor modified for the Antarctic was that the tractor-treads themselves looked to me, on this video, to be sheer painted metal-- which would slip on snow. All other Antarctica machinery I've seen use a black rubber /metal combination of some sort. I'm not expert and I could be wrong but take a look for yourself-- at the treads of this tractor and see if they make sense to you for crossing ice and snow.  Just so the reader knows, I'm proposing that we fact-check the hell out of all of these apparent missions since so much is being faked in the media today that it is definitely possible to fake an Antarctic mission.




I'd like the reader to compare the video above-- promoting the Cat machine-- to the LEM lander critique by Jungle Surfer. The entire Apollo moon missions were faked. If they can fake that, they can fake anything. Jungle Surfer looks at this LEM in the following piece, with a critical eye of a fakeologist.





NASA' S DIRTY PAWS ALL OVER ANTARCTICA-- is an ongoing surprise to me.

Rick says... I guess "space" isn't working out for NASA. Now that their space hoax has been uncovered, they're into Antarctica WAY more than I had at first imagined. This means that we've got a whole new level of problem on our hands. NASA is completely totally 100% discredited-- so therefore ANY involvement in Antarctica MUST be looked at with a super critical and contemptuous eye.  There are almost 2 million hits on Google for nasa and antarctica.
nasa antarctica - Google Search
https://www.google.com/search?q=nasa+antarctica&btnG=Search&num=100&newwindow=1&safe=off&hl=en&gl=us&authuser=0&tbas=0

NASA was, in some circles of conspiracy thinkers, created to DISTRACT us, in the 1950's, from an infinite Antarctic plain by CREATING the "myth" of "space" as a "final frontier". The true final frontier has been ice rim Antarctica all along. So now NASA is being used to further the goal of brainwashing us into thinking Antarctica is an island of ice and snow when, in fact, it may very well be the NEW frontier across which we have NO IDEA what lies.



SEEING IS BELIEVING as the motto of "The Coldest Journey" is HIGHLY SUSPICOUS

Rick say's ... Even Wikipedia-- the CIA controlled "encyclopedia" has it's own "seeing is believing" page! What? A page for a "phrase"? Yup. It's that important to "them", the "controllers".

quote

Seeing Is Believing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Seeing is believing is an idiom first recorded in this form in 1639[citation needed] that means "only physical or concrete evidence is convincing". It is the essence of St. Thomas's claim to Jesus Christ, to which the latter responded that there were those who had not seen but believed. It leads to a sophistry that "seen evidence" can be easily and correctly interpreted, when in fact, interpretation may be difficult.

Complete Idiots or Complete Hoaxsters?-- it's still undecided.

The Coldest Journey officially begins | Seeing is Believing


‘The Coldest Journey’ winter traverse of Antarctica begins today, at the March equinox. A team of five men aim to complete the first ever trans-Antarctic crossing during the polar winter.

The expedition will take place between the two seasonal equinoxes, 20 March – 20 September, with Ice Team members Brian Newham, Ian Prickett, Spencer Smirl, Richmond Dykes and Dr Robert Lambert travelling from Crown Bay to Captain Scott’s base at McMurdo Sound – via the South Pole. During this six-month period the expedition team will travel 2,400 miles in temperatures approaching -90°C and in near permanent darkness. The expedition team will be entirely self-sufficient, with search and rescue capabilities severely constrained due to the hostile winter conditions.


Raising funds to tackle avoidable blindness

As well as aiming to complete the first ever trans-Antarctic crossing during the polar winter, the expedition is attempting to raise US$5 million for Seeing is Believing. All donations will be matched by expedition sponsor, Standard Chartered, to take the fundraising target of the expedition to US$10 million.

Rick's comment-- Aha. "Standard Chartered" is a sponsor. What the hell is that? 


Sir Ranulph Fiennes, Expedition Co-Leader, was forced to pull out of the traverse at the end of February due to frostbite. Sir Ranulph continues to support The Coldest Journey by fundraising for Seeing is Believing and promoting awareness of the expedition.

He said: “Today my colleagues begin what will be a significant and life-changing challenge. They are the first people ever to try to cross the Antarctic continent during the polar winter – it is a huge feat of exploration and daring.

“It is a fantastic adventure and I am sure that it will succeed. Whilst the team are out there on the ice making history, I am proud to be here doing all that I can for the expedition and for Seeing is Believing, which is an incredibly worthy charity.

Rick's comment-- If they actually tried this, it's a STUNT, like Evil Knieval's jumps across a group of parked busses. on a motorcycle.  And it's stupid, not daring. And they didn't even make it-- so I'm right. 


Fifty-four year old Brian Newham takes over as Expedition Leader on the ice; Brian has considerable polar experience having spent more than 20 seasons in Antarctica, and having made nine visits to the Arctic.

Brian said: “Having worked for the British Antarctic Survey as a Field Assistant and as a Base Commander, I feel very at home in Antarctica. Granted, I haven’t attempted to cross the continent during winter before – no-one has!

Rick's comment- Yeah sure. Nobody has crossed the continent during summer either-- according to Math Boylan-- because it's not a continent and it can't be "crossed". It's an infinite ice rim around an Earth pond.


Raising funds to tackle avoidable blindness

As well as aiming to complete the first ever trans-Antarctic crossing during the polar winter, the expedition is attempting to raise US$5 million for Seeing is Believing. All donations will be matched by expedition sponsor, Standard Chartered, to take the fundraising target of the expedition to US$10 million.

Rick's comment: Why? I mean--- WTF?  What's the connection? I don't get it.







Discussion of map projections touches on Antarctica.

$
0
0
 I haven't reviewed this entire video but I just hit on it tonight and it seems it has points relevent to my attempt to detect the Antarctica "projection" as either island or rim. The discussion considers other continents and more. It opens up one's thinking regarding Antarctica, in the context of map projections in general.

NASA Goddard should recommend "Space Suits" for -90F in Antarctica.

$
0
0
NASA is all over Antarctica, surprisingly. First Officer Felix pointed to a video about temperatures in a previous post in this blog that I'll embed here for convenience-- that describes the temperatures. It's funny to me that we do not THEREFORE see Apollo type "space suits" for missions in Antarctica. Where are the famous space suits that are used in ORBIT, or on the MOOOON? The moooooon. Right? which is supposedly 3 days and 1/4 MILLION miles awaaaaaay.... going around the earth with the same face pointed at us all the time. Here's the video First Officer Felix points to-- sponsored by GODDARD division of NASA.



RICK'S FLAT EARTH CONJECTURE
It's c---c cc----cold out there because it was designed to keep humans out. The earth we know is flat and like a pond. The further out you go the colder it gets. The powers-that-be mathematically transformed the LONGITUDE lines south of the equator into a CONVERGING set of lines when in fact they are DIverging away from each other. There must be a SIMPLE math involved to do that. "They" have done that to convince us that we're on an isolated little ball of mud in the middle of a vast universe and relatively insignificant when in fact earth is a hyperdimensional CENTER of some sort of creation where humans are CENTRAL to the project.

Captain Cook tried to circumnavigate Antarctica and found that he was off by 20 miles per DAY-- according to accounting, including the one by famous flat earther ERic DuBAY who mysteriously banned me from his forum the first time I posted there about Antarctica... and who NEVER responded to my question of why he did that in his Atlantean forum. I still have not been able to converse with MATHematical Boylen. Math introduced the earth pond idea to me. Math wants to put spikes in the ice and go out there by rope. I want to let him know that he would die that way from a thin supply line. It's better to prove Antarctica is an ice rim from the comfort of home using the internets.

MY PROBLEM is that I cannot get a confirmation on DISTANCES BETWEEN RESEARCH STATIONS-- from EXPERIENCES of actual travellers. It is beginning to appear that the workers (80%) and the scientists (20%) are given information on "need to know" basis and are being kept ISOLATED from each other as much as possible. The project to INTERCONNECT ALL STATIONS for EFFICIENCY first proposed in 1968 has NOT been followed up on. Why not? Useful dog sleds have been banned. It's ILLEGAL to eat a penguin. Why? Official research focuses on environment, not exploration and exploitation. This is the OPPOSITE of the "human spirit" which is to EXPLORE and exploit for human benefit. There are no whorehouses and saloons in Antarctica-- like there were in the old American West's new frontier. The only gunslingers are the Antarctic Treaty Authorities who ban EVERYTHING. Antarctica is NOT a democratic free state-- it is a POLICE state. run by the New World Order and it runs INSPECTIONS to make sure all stations abide by every rule for everything under all circumstances.




Vendee Globe 2009 was tracked in detail but map confuses me.

$
0
0
This map shows that Vendee Globe racers were tracked in detail. Do the positions and time make sense on a globe or a flat earth with 4 to 5 X as much Antarctica coastline as they tell us? How did they generate the data for this map? If Earth is flat, they must be making all of this up. Is there and way to confirm these positions or are they simply generated on a computer and simulated? Can actual physical positions of boats be confirmed by third parties? The next Vendee Globe race is 2016-- apparently enough people have enough money to do these races every 4 years. I don't see how it's even possible for sailboats to go into the southern part of these oceans and dodge chunks of ice. The whole thing seems like a massive hoax to promote a "globe" and cover up the real 60,000 mile Antarctic coast. 


Reading official Antarctic Treaty System Inspection Reports to acquire distance / time data between stations.

$
0
0
It occurs to me this morning that by combing through all of the inspection reports, I can gather data about time and distance between stations. None of the inspection tours go very far-- which is consistent with a 60,000 mile perimeter rather than a 15,000 mile sphere perimeter. If inspectors were ambitious and serious, they could mount missions that did a complete circumnavigation. Not a single one has done that.
ATS - Antarctic Treaty system




Here's a video report- -a brief report-- from Royal Navy, on one of their inspection tours. The verbal description of how Antarctica is to remain "unsullied" is, of course, nonsense since there is a lot of activity going on. I'll look for more video reports. This one has no detail whatsoever. I posted a comment asking why there hasn't been a complete circumnavigation inspection.





 

Great Pyramid was center of Pangean landmass

Tom Bishop holds his own in FES forum--- I'm rather impressed.

I'm voicing vicarious concerns.

$
0
0

Slicing up Antarctica island like pizza and flipping pieces around creates a problem.

$
0
0
Below, I've drawn a circle and sliced it up like a pizza. It represents the island of Antarctica. I shaded in  3 continent areas. I drew dots to represent stations. Below that, I flipped the slices around so the center is on the outside and station dots are around the perimeter of a flat earth Antarctica. I drew a rough sketch of some continental masses in the middle. 



PROBLEMS

  • Pizza slices have curved convex edges now instead of smooth circle edges of an island. I've never seen maps or any indication that the edge goes like that. 
  • The question marks represent NEW areas created by the flipped pizza slices that would have to exist but are not any any map and can't be accounted for
  • I've never seen flat earthers do this transformation let alone address these two problems. 



Official treaty inspection tours raise questions in my mind.

$
0
0


Here are some excerpts from some inspection tours I looked at today. 

Here's an excerpt from an earlier inspection the in 1960s where we see "Group A" and "Group B". Why did they have to break up into 2 groups? Why not conduct one tour? It might be because the job involves too much travel and might not be possible with just one team. 


Here's an inspection map with no route-- only the stations inspected. Why not post the route?




Here's a partial circumnavigation which is more along the lines of what I'm interested in.  I haven't seen anything that describes what the method of selection is or how they decide on their route. If they're going almost all the way around, why not complete the trip? Because it's too far? Like 60,000 miles? 




Here is how many of the reports list dates of the various station stops. There is comprehensive LIST, just a description in a paragraph. No mileages are stated. Why not? Would that give away the situation? Are the dates correct? Who knows? 



This is one of the better maps. I had to cut it in two to make it fit my file. Note that it's almost a complete circumnavigation. I clearly shows the stops made. They travelled by ship. Why not conduct inspections via air? They never say. Too much refueling for the flat earth rim of 60,000 miles? Just guessing. 




Earlier reports are quite direct about disarming Antarctica... the first disarmament being perhaps the destruction of the German base New Shwabenland. I haven't seen any reports of flying saucers in the Antarctic Treaty reports however.





 Here's one of the only nice organized time tables I've seen.  Whether the dates are correct or not is impossible to say but at least they listed them. Time and mileage are the way we'll prove earth is flat or a globe so I'm always looking for time and date and mileage stamps on reports. 


Here's another example of stations with dates visited. No mileages though. Not sure how they travelled. 




Here's another early 1970's version of list of stations and dates. There was no map with this but there should be maps with all these routes. Of course, they weren't thinking about proving the world is round when they made the report so I suppose it's forgivable. Still-- I would have expected more maps with miles and dates than I've seen. 


source
http://www.ats.aq/DevAS/ats_governance_listinspections.aspx?lang=e


Mysterious new color scheme on Antarctica Treaty Secretartiet logo.

$
0
0

It looks like the Antarctica Treaty Secretariet has made Marie Byrd Land in East Antarctica off limits for everyone including themselves by colouring the lines of longitutde and latitude RED. The coastline between McMurdo and well into West Antarctica has GREEN lines. The half of Anatarctica above Rothera in the east south of Brazil and the area south of South Africa remains WHITE. What could it all mean?

Taking it at face value, green means go. Red means stop. White could mean neutral.



Source
ATCM XXXVIII - CEP XVIII
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/ats_meetings_meeting.aspx?lang=e



On a flat earth with an ice rim Antarctica, I've been mulling over the possibility that the actual distance between McMurdo and Rothera-- in effect-- the Marie Byrdland coast-- is where the compression mapping might take place. In other words, the distances and times are going to make sense in the green and white zones-- but the red zone is where distances will NOT make sense. I don't know what mathematics would be used to simulata lines of longitude and latitude to make that happen-- especially with airliners and ships running all over the place needing accurate information so I'm not proposing that this is the case. However, seeing the red zone causes me to reconsider that original thought. Here is my best flat earth map of Antarctica so far so the reader can compare the red and green zones above with the ice rim version.


Note that the area between Rothera and McMurdo has ONE station Russkaya that apparently no longer exists as a full station although a few references have been made to it in some reports. This stretch is, even as First Officer Felix notes, devoid of stations for the most part. The area between McMurdo around to Mawson is the green zone-- approximately where I have GREEN ARROWS above from a previous idea. From Mawson around to Rothera, is the white neurtral zone which I don't know how to interpret.



INSPECTIONS
Just one more thought on inspections. If mere sailboats can race around Antarctica at 45 to 60, then how difficult would it be for fully equipped military/scientific inspection ships to go around Antarctica for a "full and complete inspection" of all stations on the coast of Antarctica? It should not be very hard. Yet there was no inspection since the winter of 2012-2013 according to ATS reports.
ATS - Antarctic Treaty system
http://www.ats.aq/DevAS/ats_governance_listinspections.aspx?lang=e



LATEST ATS REPORT HAS NO PHOTOS
I find it amusing that the latest report is 260 pages with no pictures or diagrams or maps. How is that possible?
http://www.ats.aq/documents/ATCM37/fr/ATCM37_fr001_e.pdf






Why are all the GPS and other radar stations in West Antarctica with none in the East??

$
0
0

In the last post, I pointed out how the new logo of the ATS (Antarctica Treaty System) has red longitude and latitude lines around Marie Byrdland -- which has no research stations -- and green on the other side of McMurdo up about halfway then it's white.




Felix pointed out in the comments section that that the Marie Byrdland area is absolutely studded with GPS and other types of radar stations. 

Now why should that be? I'm of the opinion that GPS is not a satellite system- just another type of radar. But look at the number of radar installations all over Byrdland. What's going on here? And why are there none on the other side? They say they're measuring earth tremors. But is that a cover story? Is this part of a massive security system to keep out intruders? Sophisticated burgler alarms? Motion detectors for people rather than earthquakes? source:
http://polenet.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/2014_2015_Basemap_3March14.jpg





90 to 150 W Longitude Marie Byrdland is NOT "unclaimed"

$
0
0

Published on Apr 14, 2011
Claimed a territory of the United States in 1929 and 1935 by Antarctic explorers, Admiral Richard Evelyn Byrd and Lincoln Ellsworth. The territory comprises of the land area in Western Antarctica that extends between 90 degrees West and 150 degrees West on the Antarctic continent

United States Antarctic Territory of Marie Byrd Land and Ellsworth Land at 90 W - 150 W

Minerals, as well as fresh water ice-- abound in possible Antarctic "Infinite-land"--

$
0
0
The following maps are standard island continent versions of Antarctica but they illustrate what Admiral Byrd was noted for revealing to a talk showin the 1950's - featured on one of the videos made by flat earther Mark Sargent flat earth clues - Google Search....  






Better format for discussion than comments format here in the blog.

Caterpillar Corp. worth looking into for "work in the Antarctic"

$
0
0

I ran across this ad featuring the Dirty Jobs guy-- on cable-- who promotes Caterpiller. From previous Antarctica circumference posts, I've noted Caterpiller has strong presence in Antarctica. If A'a (Antarctica) is an infinite plain leading to other Earth Ponds, then the future of Caterpillar might be very strong indeed. Byrd was saying in the 50's that there's lot of coal and other minerals we can use and there's lots of fresh water ice there so Caterpiller is well positioned to be a machinery company that knows how to access all of that. What if the AT (A'a Treaty) is merely a "front" to fool the world into continuing to believe in the island theory-- and the sphere theory-- while behind the scenes, 80% of the personnel in A'a who are not scientists-- but workers-- are operating machinery like Cats to "move into A'a" and set up shop? I cannot think Cat, now, without thinking A'a.


DISCUSSION LINK
CATERPILLER CORP is in Antarctica --and needs workers.
(Felix, try this-- it's threaded-- and has "pop up" features that make it more useful for "hard work" which I think we're going to need).



CATERPILLAR STOCK UP 6X in 10 yrs.

DISCUSSION forum-- with threads... try this Felix... Cat stock up 6X in 10 yrs.



CATS used for filling crevasses (pot holes) on fuel depot roads.

The more I see of what's going on in Antarctica-- a possible ice rim around a stationary flat earth rather than an island continent "at the bottom of a spinning blue marble in space" [unlikely]-- the more I understand how VOLUMINOUS the traffic is down there-- and how numerous and neccessary fuel depots are. What's going on is FAR MORE than anyone who just reads regular media or even alternative media is aware of. You really have to hunt for this information on your own and when you do, you realize that Antarctica is a HUGE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT--- that it can almost be considered BLACK BUDGET since we're not hearing any financials from Congress or any world authorities. But the budget must be huuuuge... Here is another video of a CATERPILLER filling potholes in a road going to a fuel depot-- and it NOW appears there are hundreds if not thousands of fuel depots being positioned these days.


[Discussionof pot holes and fuel depots.]


Viewing all 111 articles
Browse latest View live